Pages

Sunday, May 30, 2010

WEEK 3 - Hurricane Activity

The week three activity involved collecting, analyzing and reporting on the data surrounding the Category 3 landfall of Hurricane Katrina on August 29th, 2005. Four maps were produced analyzing the data several different ways.

Map 1 is a base map, analyzing the elevations and hydrography of Coastal Mississippi.



Map 2 is an analysis of the land flooded by the 15’ storm surge, broken down by land type. The investigation revealed that 55% of the flooded land was coastal wetlands shown in the bar graph displayed on the map.





Map 3 was used to analyze the coastal infrastructure and the hospital facilities within the flooded areas that were potentially at risk. A recommendation for resource funding was to be made from the analysis.





Map 4 depicts the land types likely to be flooded along the coastal region of impact with a table insert displaying the acres and square miles of each land type affected.





The most challenging phase of the analysis was the initial base map. A strict adherence to the outline was required to achieve the desired result.

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Week 2 - Earthquake Activity

This weeks assignment included the following:

1. From Analyze hazards associated with the New Madrid fault zone exercise / Step 8‐ Identify vulnerable railroads: JPEG MAP of final results.













2. From Analyze the pattern of building damage / Step 9 Final Results Map: JPEG Map of Final_Northridge1.













3. From Examine the spatial distribution of after shocks / Step 5 Mapping significant aftershocks: JPEG map of results.














4. From Examine the temporal distribution of aftershocks / Step 5: JPEG of final Final_Northridge3 map including all graphs.










Monday, May 17, 2010

SUMMER - 2010

First BLOG of the Summer Session. Last semester felt like it went really well ... I look forward to what is in store for us this summer.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Week 11 - Spatial Analysis

Basics of ArcGIS spatial analyst and 3D analyst. Label manager

Week 10 - Geocoding

Spring Break Map

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Week 9 - Vector Analysis

Q1: Which tool did you use? Was there any noticeable difference between its results and the results from the instructions?

The intersect tool was used which resulted in no significant difference from that of the union tool.

Q2: Which tool did you use here? Why?
I used the erase tool. This allowed me to analyze the area of the union between the road criteria and water criteria that fell outside of the conservation areas.

Q3: How many features are in this layer? What is the area of the largest feature? What is the area of the smallest feature?

The result was 79 features which included the largest of 1919 Acres and less than 1 Acre for the smallest.